- DTN Headline News
Enviros Ask Court to Kill Water Rule
By Todd Neeley
Tuesday, July 14, 2020 2:35PM CDT

OMAHA (DTN) -- The plaintiffs in one of several lawsuits challenging the Navigable Waters Protection Rule have asked a federal court to vacate the rule.

In a motion for summary judgment filed at the end of last week, the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League alleges the EPA's new rule is "arbitrary, capricious and unlawful" and asked the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina to throw it out.

Agriculture, petroleum and other interest groups have intervened in the case, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, National Corn Growers Association, National Pork Producers Council and U.S. Poultry and Egg Association, among others.

The South Carolina Coastal Conservation League alleged in its lawsuit in April that the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers completed the rule based on "political winds and currents."

The rule, published in the Federal Register on April 21, is alleged by the groups to have the effect of "dramatically reducing the universe of waters protected" by the Clean Water Act.

In its motion for summary judgment, the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League said the protection of the nation's waters are at stake.

"The rule challenged here is an arbitrary reversal of agency policy that removes the Clean Water Act's safeguards from millions of stream miles, tens of millions of wetland acres, and important recreational lakes and drinking water reservoirs like South Carolina's Lake Keowee, all in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and the Clean Water Act," the motion said.

"If this rule stands, developers, industry, or anyone else can pollute, fill, or pave over these waters without federal permit protections provided by the CWA. At stake is the integrity of our nation's waters, including headwater streams, coastal wetlands, and public lakes across the region and country that have been protected by the CWA as 'waters of the United States' since the act's passage."

The motion argues the agencies did not apply their "scientific expertise" in creating the new rule.

"Not only did they jettison the science and data underlying past definitions of 'waters of United States,' they also engaged in arbitrary line-drawing with inconsistent and unpredictable results that make no sense on the ground," the groups said.

"The rule's promulgation and its irrational outcomes epitomize 'arbitrary and capricious' rulemaking prohibited by the APA (Administrative Procedure Act). By creating a rule that eliminates federal jurisdiction from vast numbers of streams and wetlands whose degradation will harm the nation's waters, the agencies also violated the CWA (Clean Water Act)."

Another lawsuit challenging the new rule is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico.

The New Mexico Cattlemen's Association alleges in that suit the new rule still leaves farmers and ranchers exposed to regulation of private property.

The lawsuit filed by the New Mexico Cattlemen's Association alleges both the 1986 regulation and the new rule illegally regulate non-navigable ponds, wetlands and tributaries.

The group originally filed a lawsuit in November 2019 challenging the 1986 regulation. The challenge came after the EPA finalized a repeal of the 2015 rule, because the repeal reverted to the 1986 rule until the most recent rewrite was completed.

Back in March 2017, then-EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt launched a review of the rule and hinted in an agency document that a rewrite may include the removal of the so-called "significant nexus" test, which has been the subject of many lawsuits.

The definition of navigable waters was expanded in the 2015 waters of the United States, or WOTUS, rule to include tributaries and other waters that are connected to larger navigable water bodies. The review came as a result of an executive order by President Donald Trump.

Todd Neeley can be reached at todd.neeley@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @toddneeleyDTN

blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Monday, July 13, 2020 8:44AM CDT
Monday, July 6, 2020 9:30AM CDT
Monday, June 29, 2020 11:58AM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Tuesday, July 14, 2020 10:11AM CDT
Friday, July 10, 2020 7:54AM CDT
Wednesday, July 1, 2020 10:28AM CDT
Minding Ag's Business
Katie Behlinger
Farm Business Editor
Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:02PM CDT
Thursday, March 19, 2020 12:08PM CDT
Wednesday, March 18, 2020 11:19AM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Wednesday, July 15, 2020 6:46AM CDT
Monday, July 13, 2020 2:41PM CDT
Friday, July 10, 2020 4:34PM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Wednesday, June 10, 2020 4:12PM CDT
Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:35PM CDT
Friday, May 15, 2020 4:49PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Monday, July 13, 2020 1:59PM CDT
Monday, July 6, 2020 4:26PM CDT
Monday, June 29, 2020 4:37PM CDT
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Wednesday, April 29, 2020 4:04PM CDT
Tuesday, April 21, 2020 1:29PM CDT
Tuesday, April 14, 2020 3:41PM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Friday, July 10, 2020 11:11AM CDT
Wednesday, July 1, 2020 10:09AM CDT
Friday, June 19, 2020 8:22AM CDT
Machinery Chatter
Dan Miller
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Tuesday, July 14, 2020 3:51PM CDT
Thursday, July 9, 2020 4:18PM CDT
Friday, June 26, 2020 8:14AM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Wednesday, July 15, 2020 3:12PM CDT
Tuesday, July 14, 2020 4:42PM CDT
Monday, July 13, 2020 5:13PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Monday, June 29, 2020 1:35PM CDT
Friday, June 5, 2020 4:14PM CDT
Friday, May 22, 2020 3:51PM CDT
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN